Text Embedding 3 (Small) is 91% cheaper than Gemini 2.0 Flash on blended 3:1 token pricing. Text Embedding 3 (Small) costs $0.02/1M in and $0.00/1M out, while Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M in and $0.40/1M out.
Text Embedding 3 (Small) vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between OpenAI and Google.
| Metric / Feature | Text Embedding 3 (Small) (OpenAI) | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.02 | $0.10 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.00 | $0.40 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | Not Available | $0.025/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.015 / 1M | $0.175 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 8k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | N/A | 84.6% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast | Ultra-Fast (~110 t/s) |
| Best For | Vector search, semantic clustering, RAG index creation | Real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops |
When to Choose Text Embedding 3 (Small)
Choose Text Embedding 3 (Small) if your workload requires vector search, semantic clustering, rag index creation. Ideal for teams needing OpenAI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if your primary objective is real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Google.
Want to compare Text Embedding 3 (Small) against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.