Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) is 60% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on blended 3:1 token pricing. Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) costs $0.59/1M in and $0.79/1M out, while Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out.
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Groq (Meta) and Anthropic.
| Metric / Feature | Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) (Groq (Meta)) | Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.59 | $0.80 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.79 | $4.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | Not Available | $0.080/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.640 / 1M | $1.600 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 86.0% | 75.2% |
| Throughput & Latency | Instant (~280 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) |
| Best For | Instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents | Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning |
When to Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)
Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) if your workload requires instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents. Ideal for teams needing Groq (Meta)'s infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your primary objective is real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Anthropic.
Want to compare Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.