Gemini 2.0 Flash is 33% cheaper than GPT-4o Mini on blended 3:1 token pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M in and $0.40/1M out, while GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M in and $0.60/1M out.
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4o Mini
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Google and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google) | GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.10 | $0.15 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.40 | $0.60 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.025/1M | $0.075/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.175 / 1M | $0.263 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 84.6% | 82.0% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~110 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~85 t/s) |
| Best For | Real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops | High-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization |
When to Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash if your workload requires real-time multimodal voice/video streaming, low-latency agent loops. Ideal for teams needing Google's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose GPT-4o Mini
Choose GPT-4o Mini if your primary objective is high-volume classification, customer support bots, lightweight summarization. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare Gemini 2.0 Flash against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.