Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) is 87% cheaper than Codestral 22B on blended 3:1 token pricing. Codestral 22B costs $0.30/1M in and $0.90/1M out, while Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) costs $0.05/1M in and $0.08/1M out.
Codestral 22B vs Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Mistral AI and Groq (Meta).
| Metric / Feature | Codestral 22B (Mistral AI) | Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) (Groq (Meta)) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.30 | $0.05 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.90 | $0.08 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | Not Available | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $0.450 / 1M | $0.058 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 81.1% | 73.0% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~80 t/s) | Blazing (~550 t/s) |
| Best For | Fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, IDE integration | Instant search indexing, real-time moderation, intent classification |
When to Choose Codestral 22B
Choose Codestral 22B if your workload requires fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, ide integration. Ideal for teams needing Mistral AI's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq)
Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instant (Groq) if your primary objective is instant search indexing, real-time moderation, intent classification. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Groq (Meta).
Want to compare Codestral 22B against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.