GPT-4o (Omni) is 27% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out, while GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.50/1M in and $10.00/1M out.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) vs GPT-4o (Omni)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and OpenAI.
| Metric / Feature | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) | GPT-4o (Omni) (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $3.00 | $2.50 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $15.00 | $10.00 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.300/1M | $1.250/1M |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $6.000 / 1M | $4.375 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 200k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| MMLU Benchmark | 88.3% | 88.7% |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast (~50 t/s) | Fast (~45 t/s) |
| Best For | Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning | Complex enterprise workflows, high-precision coding, multi-modal analysis |
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your workload requires autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose GPT-4o (Omni)
Choose GPT-4o (Omni) if your primary objective is complex enterprise workflows, high-precision coding, multi-modal analysis. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with OpenAI.
Want to compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.