Codestral 22B is 92% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) costs $3.00/1M in and $15.00/1M out, while Codestral 22B costs $0.30/1M in and $0.90/1M out.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) vs Codestral 22B
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and Mistral AI.
| Metric / Feature | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) (Anthropic) | Codestral 22B (Mistral AI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $3.00 | $0.30 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $15.00 | $0.90 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.300/1M | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $6.000 / 1M | $0.450 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 200k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ✅ Supported | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 88.3% | 81.1% |
| Throughput & Latency | Fast (~50 t/s) | Ultra-Fast (~80 t/s) |
| Best For | Autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning | Fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, IDE integration |
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2)
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) if your workload requires autonomous coding, complex tool use, multi-step agent reasoning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Codestral 22B
Choose Codestral 22B if your primary objective is fill-in-the-middle code completion, automated unit tests, ide integration. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Mistral AI.
Want to compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet (v2) against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.