Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) is 60% cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on blended 3:1 token pricing. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M in and $4.00/1M out, while Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) costs $0.59/1M in and $0.79/1M out.
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)
Compare verified input/output token rates, prompt caching discounts, latency tiers, and context limits between Anthropic and Groq (Meta).
| Metric / Feature | Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) | Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) (Groq (Meta)) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $0.80 | $0.59 |
| Output Price ($ / 1M Tokens) | $4.00 | $0.79 |
| Prompt Caching Input Rate | $0.080/1M | Not Available |
| Blended 3:1 Rate (Production) | $1.600 / 1M | $0.640 / 1M |
| Max Context Window | 128k | 128k |
| Multimodal Vision | ❌ Text Only | ❌ Text Only |
| MMLU Benchmark | 75.2% | 86.0% |
| Throughput & Latency | Ultra-Fast (~95 t/s) | Instant (~280 t/s) |
| Best For | Real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning | Instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents |
When to Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if your workload requires real-time agents, code completion, fast document scanning. Ideal for teams needing Anthropic's infrastructure and ecosystem tooling.
When to Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU)
Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq LPU) if your primary objective is instantaneous interactive chatbots, real-time voice translation, low-latency tool agents. Ideal for scaling high-throughput pipelines with Groq (Meta).
Want to compare Claude 3.5 Haiku against another model?
Select another target model to view immediate pricing & latency trade-offs.